Skip to content

Issues: w3c/charter-drafts

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

45 Open 162 Closed
45 Open 162 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Label
Filter by label
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

[wg/fedid] Shouldn't there be a liaison with the DID Working Group?
#499 opened Apr 19, 2024 by iherman
@simoneonofri
2
[wg/fedid] Proofread the charter draft
#497 opened Apr 18, 2024 by jyasskin
@simoneonofri
3
[wg/svg] References to Director
#489 opened Mar 18, 2024 by fantasai
[wg/svg] CFC period
#488 opened Mar 18, 2024 by fantasai
[wg/das] Charter missing text AC-review Raised during the AC review phase, or otherwise intended to be treated then.
#476 opened Jan 10, 2024 by plehegar
@himorin
[wg/did] Do not remove wording about 'seeking consensus' AC-review Raised during the AC review phase, or otherwise intended to be treated then.
#475 opened Dec 15, 2023 by pchampin
@pchampin
1
[wg/did] Authorize the group to work on DID-method-related Notes AC-review Raised during the AC review phase, or otherwise intended to be treated then.
#473 opened Dec 15, 2023 by pchampin
@pchampin
1
[template] Provide text for potential deliverables that might advance from incubation template
#472 opened Dec 14, 2023 by jyasskin
@svgeesus
[wg/solid] make it clear that the WG will abide by the W3C process AC-review Raised during the AC review phase, or otherwise intended to be treated then. formal-objection Formal objection from AC Review
#459 opened Oct 11, 2023 by pchampin
@pchampin
2
[wg/solid] broaden the scope: charter should be about a problem, not a solution AC-review Raised during the AC review phase, or otherwise intended to be treated then. formal-objection Formal objection from AC Review
#458 opened Oct 11, 2023 by pchampin
@pchampin
[wg/solid] W3C must not rubberstamp the product of a single company AC-review Raised during the AC review phase, or otherwise intended to be treated then. formal-objection Formal objection from AC Review
#457 opened Oct 11, 2023 by pchampin
@pchampin
[wg/solid] liaise with the IETF HTTP WG AC-review Raised during the AC review phase, or otherwise intended to be treated then. formal-objection Formal objection from AC Review
#456 opened Oct 11, 2023 by pchampin
@pchampin
[wg/solid] choice of the proposed chairs AC-review Raised during the AC review phase, or otherwise intended to be treated then. formal-objection Formal objection from AC Review
#455 opened Oct 11, 2023 by pchampin
@pchampin
1
[wg/solid] update links and text of the charter AC-review Raised during the AC review phase, or otherwise intended to be treated then.
#454 opened Oct 11, 2023 by pchampin
@pchampin
[wg/solid] describe deliverables and their dependencies more precisely AC-review Raised during the AC review phase, or otherwise intended to be treated then. formal-objection Formal objection from AC Review
#453 opened Oct 11, 2023 by pchampin
@pchampin
1
[wg/solid] extend timeline AC-review Raised during the AC review phase, or otherwise intended to be treated then. formal-objection Formal objection from AC Review
#452 opened Oct 11, 2023 by pchampin
@pchampin
[template] Should say something about how to become an invited expert
#451 opened Sep 26, 2023 by jyasskin
@svgeesus
1
[wg/did] reword charter to not assume a specific browser development process
#447 opened Sep 24, 2023 by pchampin
@pchampin
2
[wg/audio] Charter feasibility question
#439 opened Sep 15, 2023 by Pomax
@svgeesus
6
[wg/did] Document how current implementers interop using DID-core-v1
#438 opened Sep 12, 2023 by rxgrant
@pchampin
3
[wg/did] Make it explicit that WG agreement is to begin the process of developing DiD Methods AC-review Raised during the AC review phase, or otherwise intended to be treated then. enhancement
#434 opened Sep 7, 2023 by plehegar
@pchampin
4
[template] interoperable implementations should always be a success criterion enhancement template
#432 opened Aug 28, 2023 by npdoty
@svgeesus
1
[wg/did] Remove "Decentralized Identifier (DID) Method Specifications" from deliverables. AC-review Raised during the AC review phase, or otherwise intended to be treated then. formal-objection Formal objection from AC Review
#431 opened Aug 18, 2023 by plehegar
@pchampin
3
[wg/did] Allow work on DID Core v2.0 and allow it to advance to Candidate Recommendation AC-review Raised during the AC review phase, or otherwise intended to be treated then. enhancement formal-objection Formal objection from AC Review
#429 opened Aug 17, 2023 by plehegar
@pchampin
4
[wg/did] Allow the did:web and did:key specifications to advance to CR AC-review Raised during the AC review phase, or otherwise intended to be treated then. enhancement
#428 opened Aug 17, 2023 by plehegar
@pchampin
6
ProTip! Exclude everything labeled bug with -label:bug.