Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[wg/did] Do not remove wording about 'seeking consensus' #475

Closed
pchampin opened this issue Dec 15, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

[wg/did] Do not remove wording about 'seeking consensus' #475

pchampin opened this issue Dec 15, 2023 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
AC-review Raised during the AC review phase, or otherwise intended to be treated then.

Comments

@pchampin
Copy link
Contributor

From https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-charters-review/2023Dec/0003.html (member-visible):

I'm particularly concerned to see the removal of the phrase "seek consensus around the best way to achieve effective interoperability" from the introductory paragraph; we believe achieving effective interoperability is critically important to this work overall (indeed, critical to ANY thing striving to be a web standard). It's not clear to me when this phrase disappeared (before the call held immediately after Thanksgiving, anyway), but we object to the removal of this phrase - the point of creating a web standard should be to encourage, enable and promote interoperability.

This objection was raised on the amended charter proposal following the mediation period:
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-charters-review/2023Dec/0000.html (member-visible)

The change occurred in aacf57d , and the removal of the words "seek consensus around the best way to achieve effective interoperability" was only a side-effect of the change of direction taken by the charter. Consequently, PR #474 was proposed to reintroduced these words.

@pchampin pchampin added AC-review Raised during the AC review phase, or otherwise intended to be treated then. formal-objection Formal objection from AC Review labels Dec 15, 2023
@pchampin
Copy link
Contributor Author

It turns out that this objection was not a formal objection. Furthermore, it was resolved with #474.

@pchampin pchampin removed the formal-objection Formal objection from AC Review label Apr 21, 2024
@plehegar
Copy link
Member

The charter was announced

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AC-review Raised during the AC review phase, or otherwise intended to be treated then.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants