[wg/solid] W3C must not rubberstamp the product of a single company

[pchampin]

Solid is perceived as being one company's (namely, Inrupt's) product.

From https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2023Oct/0006.html

We second the many comments with regards to the WG chairs. There are
definitely strong and valid concerns 1.) with regard to a focus in
standardization on one company's
product-related work

From https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2023Oct/0007.html

Is Solid WG really a thinly veiled Inrupt WG? We would like to see
explicit disclosures on the existence of any financial relationships
between Inrupt and any consulting companies that are supporters or
contributing staff to this effort.

and other reviews (member-visible only)