test: issue with duplicated prefix for checkpoints on cloud

[aryarm]

Implements a test to reproduce issue #574: checkpoints in cloud execution mode.

QC

• The PR contains a test case for the changes or the changes are already covered by an existing test case.
• The documentation (docs/) is updated to reflect the changes or this is not necessary (e.g. if the change does neither modify the language nor the behavior or functionalities of Snakemake).

[aryarm]

@johanneskoester , I'm not really sure why the tests seemed to have passed in CI 😕

The new test didn't pass when I tried it locally... 🤔

[aryarm]

hmm the checks seem to be passing, still :(
But on second thought, it doesn't look like the GLS tests are actually getting executed in the first place.

Maybe it's because the PR needs the update-container-image label like in #691? Can you add that label for me? I don't think I have permission.

[sonarcloud]

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!   

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
0 Code Smells

No Coverage information
No Duplication information

[aryarm]

Ok, the newest CI error seems to indicate that the DOCKER_USERNAME secret isn't getting passed to the action correctly here.

Unable to find the username. Did you set with.username?

Can you verify that the secret is set correctly?

[johanneskoester]

The problem is that you are on a fork. forks don't have access to all the necessary secrets. Let me do the following: you become part of the Snakemake organization, then you can re-issue your PR from within the original repo, not as a fork. Would that be ok for you?

[aryarm]

Sure, that sounds good to me. As a long-time user of Snakemake, I really value having the opportunity to help contribute to it and give a little back to the community!

[johanneskoester]

Awesome, you have an invitation now.

[aryarm]

closing in favor of #1294