You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The changes made by #1459 break cluster execution using the "lsf" profile created by @mbhall88. I'm slightly guessing here, but I think the change now quoting the argument "{statuscmd} '{jobid}'".format( causes the "lsf" profile to try and parse the jobid as ' ' which is not a base10 number and causes an error.
Simple fix is to change the lsf_status.py script here and the line below to split the argv[1] and use the first for jobid and second for log. (Pull request here)
It is probably impossible to test-case every cluster profile, so not sure if this can be realistically avoided in the future.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
My apologies for inadvertently breaking the LSF profile! I didn't know that LSF passed the log file along with the job ID. Glad to see you were able to so quickly identify and fix the problem though.
The changes made by #1459 break cluster execution using the "lsf" profile created by @mbhall88. I'm slightly guessing here, but I think the change now quoting the argument
"{statuscmd} '{jobid}'".format(
causes the "lsf" profile to try and parse the jobid as ' ' which is not a base10 number and causes an error.Simple fix is to change the lsf_status.py script here and the line below to split the argv[1] and use the first for jobid and second for log. (Pull request here)
It is probably impossible to test-case every cluster profile, so not sure if this can be realistically avoided in the future.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: