New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update operator-observability version #1774
Changes from 1 commit
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@RamLavi
Are we fine with custom version ? (here and on few others)
I believe we do since it is official repo, but will be good to have your opinion please
fwiw we are doing the same already one line above
once we want to upgrade again, we will need to change the updated packages together possibly
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think we have a problem with that, but one has to make sure to not take a "half baked" version, so it makes sense for @machadovilaca to explain on the commit message why he intentionally didn't choose a formal release for operator-observability (is it because there isn't one yet that has the fix you need? If so - can you try and reach out their maintainer and ask them to issue one?)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
IIUC it is because real breaking changes that aint easy to fix
kubernetes/client-go#1075 (comment)
CNAO depends on kubevirt client which use old libs, and if we want to update here, it will conflict
but sure lets hear the PR author he knows best of course
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
due to versions incompatibilities between dependency packages, namely
prometheus-operator -> controller-runtime
, the proposed version for theoperator-observability
package, which is not a streamlined version therefore the custom version, uses Golang 1.19 and a downgraded version ofprometheus-operator
which is compatible with CNAO current state