Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NodeUnschedulable: scheduler queueing hints #122334

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 18, 2023

Conversation

carlory
Copy link
Member

@carlory carlory commented Dec 15, 2023

What type of PR is this?

/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:

we previously implemented NodeAffinity QHint in #119396, but we reverted that in #122288 because of #122284, this PR implements QHint again with taking the problematic scenario into consideration

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Part of #118893

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

kube-scheduler implements scheduling hints for the NodeUnschedulable plugin.
The scheduling hints allow the scheduler to only retry scheduling a Pod
that was previously rejected by the NodeSchedulable plugin if a new Node or a Node update sets .spec.unschedulable to false.

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:

- [KEP]: https://github.com/kubernetes/enhancements/issues/4247

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. labels Dec 15, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

This issue is currently awaiting triage.

If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the triage/accepted label and provide further guidance.

The triage/accepted label can be added by org members by writing /triage accepted in a comment.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. label Dec 15, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/scheduling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scheduling. and removed do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Dec 15, 2023
@carlory carlory changed the title scheduler/NodeUnschedulable: reduce pod scheduling latency NodeUnschedulable: scheduler queueing hints Dec 15, 2023
@carlory
Copy link
Member Author

carlory commented Dec 15, 2023

unrelated test fails.
/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kind

@sanposhiho
Copy link
Member

sanposhiho commented Dec 16, 2023

/assign

Thanks, I'll review this, hopefully within this weekend

Copy link
Member

@sanposhiho sanposhiho left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just two nits

Copy link
Member

@sanposhiho sanposhiho left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sorry I overlooked one point:

Co-authored-by: wackxu <xushiwei5@huawei.com>
Co-authored-by: Kensei Nakada <handbomusic@gmail.com>
Copy link
Member

@sanposhiho sanposhiho left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@kubernetes/sig-scheduling-approvers PTAL for /approve, the bot assigned it to me for approval.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 16, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 39fb85c83aa63cda1dc4a1bfb008460809b25ae3

@carlory
Copy link
Member Author

carlory commented Dec 18, 2023

/test pull-kubernetes-e2e-kind-ipv6

@alculquicondor
Copy link
Member

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: alculquicondor, carlory

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 18, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit d747051 into kubernetes:master Dec 18, 2023
14 checks passed
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.30 milestone Dec 18, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. sig/scheduling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scheduling. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants