Fix handling of case-sensitive set loops in RegexPrefixAnalyzer.FindPrefixes #101608
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/area-system-text-regularexpressions |
|
Perhaps I'm not following, but wouldn't we normally avoid making a change that isn't exercised, and instead include it with the change that uses it? |
The code is already there. It should be correct. |
…refixes
For an expression like `[Aa]{2}`, we were generating the strings "AA" and "aa" but not "Aa" or "aA".
This code isn't exercised yet, as we're currently only using FindPrefixes for case-insensitive, but I'm trying to enable it for case-sensitive as well, and hit this. I'm not adding new tests here as plenty of existing tests catch it once it's enabled.
stephentoub
force-pushed
the
fixsetloops
branch
from
0b4bd8f
to
e77256f
Compare
This was referenced Apr 26, 2024
Closed
stephentoub
force-pushed
the
fixsetloops
branch
from
e77256f
to
db16aa9
Compare
MihaZupan
approved these changes
Apr 29, 2024
matouskozak
pushed a commit
to matouskozak/runtime
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 30, 2024
…refixes (dotnet#101608) * Fix handling of case-sensitive set loops in RegexPrefixAnalyzer.FindPrefixes For an expression like `[Aa]{2}`, we were generating the strings "AA" and "aa" but not "Aa" or "aA". This code isn't exercised yet, as we're currently only using FindPrefixes for case-insensitive, but I'm trying to enable it for case-sensitive as well, and hit this. I'm not adding new tests here as plenty of existing tests catch it once it's enabled. * Also exit early as soon as we can detect too many possible prefixes
michaelgsharp
pushed a commit
to michaelgsharp/runtime
that referenced
this pull request
May 9, 2024
…refixes (dotnet#101608) * Fix handling of case-sensitive set loops in RegexPrefixAnalyzer.FindPrefixes For an expression like `[Aa]{2}`, we were generating the strings "AA" and "aa" but not "Aa" or "aA". This code isn't exercised yet, as we're currently only using FindPrefixes for case-insensitive, but I'm trying to enable it for case-sensitive as well, and hit this. I'm not adding new tests here as plenty of existing tests catch it once it's enabled. * Also exit early as soon as we can detect too many possible prefixes
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
For an expression like
[Aa]{2}, we were generating the strings "AA" and "aa" but not "Aa" or "aA".This code isn't exercised yet, as we're currently only using FindPrefixes for case-insensitive, but I'm trying to enable it for case-sensitive as well, and hit this. I'm not adding new tests here as plenty of existing tests catch it once it's enabled.