New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bump ver component-library to 38.0.0 #28486
Conversation
…f-veterans-affairs/vets-website into update-component-lib-38.0.0
Signed-off-by: Micah Chiang <micahkchiang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Micah Chiang <micahkchiang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Micah Chiang <micahkchiang@gmail.com>
...ts/e2e/keyboard-nav-test/secure-messaging-compose-error-message-keyboard-nav.cypress.spec.js
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: Micah Chiang <micahkchiang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Micah Chiang <micahkchiang@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Micah Chiang <micahkchiang@gmail.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM from a Public Websites perspective!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good from the Pensions team
Summary
This PR bumps the version of component-library to 38.0.0.
Related issue(s)
2476
Testing done
local unit testing
Screenshots
Note: This field is mandatory for UI changes (non-component work should NOT have screenshots).
What areas of the site does it impact?
(Describe what parts of the site are impacted if code touched other areas)
Acceptance criteria
Quality Assurance & Testing
Error Handling
Authentication
#sitewide-public-websites
Slack channel for questionsRequested Feedback
(OPTIONAL) What should the reviewers know in addition to the above. Is there anything specific you wish the reviewer to assist with. Do you have any concerns with this PR, why?