Fix doc comment on AssetActionMinimal

[Davier]

Objective

The doc comment on AssetActionMinimal links to itself instead of AssetAction

[Nilirad]

I think the second link can be entirely removed. We don't need to link twice in the same sentence. We can go even one step further and reword the sentence to avoid mentioning the name twice.

[Davier]

I think the second link can be entirely removed. We don't need to link twice in the same sentence. We can go even one step further and reword the sentence to avoid mentioning the name twice.

This repetition is present on AssetMetaMinimal, AssetActionMinimal, ProcessedInfoMinimal and arguably AssetMetaDyn, so it could have been intentional (maybe for clarity).
I personally don't care either way, but if you do want that change, I should update all of them. I'll think of an alternative phrasing, feel free to make suggestions.

[Nilirad]

Since the scope of this PR is quite small, I think you can re-scope it to remove all the repetitions. It may be reworded to something like:

/// Minimal version of [`X`].
///
/// Speeds up or enables serialization where the non-minimal version of the item is not needed.

Also keep in mind that when splitting in two sentences, repetition is less of a problem. In any case, there shouldn't be a double link.

[BD103]

This PR can be closed. The comment has been updated sometime around Asset V2. AssetMetaMinimal

[rparrett]

This PR can be closed. The comment has been updated sometime around Asset V2.

This PR is post-assets-v2 and is about AssetActionMinimal rather than AssetMetaMinimal.

[rparrett]

This is an improvement as-is.

[BD103]

This PR is post-assets-v2 and is about AssetActionMinimal rather than AssetMetaMinimal.

Whoops! My bad 😅

[mockersf]

rebasing to get new required ci jobs... but forgot that I should have wait a few more minutes 🤦