Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

comparing svaba to snowman #102

Open
anoronh4 opened this issue Jun 15, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

comparing svaba to snowman #102

anoronh4 opened this issue Jun 15, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@anoronh4
Copy link

anoronh4 commented Jun 15, 2021

We are reaching out to understand any major differences between svaba and snowman, that could cause the calls to be very different. We recently downloaded some PCAWG results that were generated using snowman, and ran svaba starting from the same bams, and then compared the two results using mergeSVvcf. There are about 40 samples. Consistently across the samples we found that there are many variants that are unique to each caller, and less variants shared by both callers than we would expect. Perhaps the snowman calls we downloaded were filtered, and therefore missing svaba calls, but that does not explain why our unfiltered svaba calls are missing a lot of snowman calls. We are happy to provide some examples if you want to look into it further.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant