Skip to content

Issues: quicwg/multipath

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

49 Open 138 Closed
49 Open 138 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Label
Filter by label
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

Add a short name for "Multipath Extension for QUIC" (possibly "Multipath QUIC") and an abbreviation (possibly "MP-QUIC") editorial
#335 opened May 14, 2024 by SpencerDawkins
1
Which/how many unused CIDs SHOULD be provided? design
#333 opened May 14, 2024 by mirjak
1
Should active_connection_id_limit be per path or per connection? design explicit path ID needs-discussion
#332 opened May 14, 2024 by mirjak
Designing odd/even path-id, or not. design explicit path ID needs-discussion
#328 opened Apr 3, 2024 by huitema
1
6
How will MPQUIC support the scenario where the client connects with a dual-stack server via both IPv4 and IPv6 paths? separate draft
#327 opened Apr 3, 2024 by yangfurong
6
The spec doesn't say enough about DPLPMTUD or max_udp_payload_size question Further information is requested
#326 opened Apr 2, 2024 by LPardue
1
CID allocation strategy question Further information is requested
#325 opened Mar 21, 2024 by Yanmei-Liu
1
Rename "initial_max_paths / MAX_PATHS" to "intial_max_path_id / MAX_PATH_ID" ? design explicit path ID question Further information is requested
#324 opened Mar 21, 2024 by Yanmei-Liu
1
Alternative to defining a bunch of MP-specific frames no-action-needed
#323 opened Mar 20, 2024 by martinthomson
3
Static path IDs? design duplicate This issue or pull request already exists explicit path ID needs-discussion
#321 opened Mar 19, 2024 by kazuho
1
Sending NEW_CONNECTION_ID and RETIRE_CONNECTION_ID frames when multipath has been negotiated editorial explicit path ID
#320 opened Mar 18, 2024 by michael-eriksson
5
What if a client falsely links two paths using CIDs associated with the same path ID explicit path ID
#319 opened Mar 17, 2024 by yfmascgy
7
Should path numbers be continuous? editorial explicit path ID needs PR
#318 opened Mar 17, 2024 by huitema
6
explicit path IDs: Should server preferred address have its own path ID? explicit path ID needs PR
#317 opened Mar 17, 2024 by marten-seemann
2
When to CID expire if using Unique Path ID? explicit path ID
#313 opened Mar 16, 2024 by huitema
4
PATH_STANDBY PATH_AVAILABLE Sequence number spaces editorial
#312 opened Mar 16, 2024 by gloinul
2
Simplify reference to whose sequence number space. has PR no-action-needed
#311 opened Mar 16, 2024 by gloinul
3
Clarify refragmenting of stream data when MTU is different and retransmission happens on other path. editorial
#309 opened Mar 16, 2024 by gloinul
7
Expand LIA editorial
#308 opened Mar 16, 2024 by gloinul
Clarify requirement to avoid wrapping CID seqenunce number design question Further information is requested
#307 opened Mar 16, 2024 by gloinul
2
In some situations the ACK frames will be for CID with sequence number 1 design no-action-needed
#306 opened Mar 16, 2024 by gloinul
3
Split State diagram based on role as sender on a path or receiver. editorial
#305 opened Mar 16, 2024 by gloinul
Unclear usage of direciton of Path in specifcation text editorial has PR no-action-needed
#304 opened Mar 16, 2024 by gloinul
2
Recommendation on token ambiguity issue is violating RFC 9000 editorial question Further information is requested
#303 opened Mar 16, 2024 by gloinul
3
Write Security Consideration section needs PR
#301 opened Mar 16, 2024 by gloinul
ProTip! Exclude everything labeled bug with -label:bug.