Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use even numbers for path ID #331

Closed
wants to merge 9 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

huitema
Copy link
Contributor

@huitema huitema commented Apr 17, 2024

This PR specifies using even number path identifiers. It anticipates the possibility of using the odd numbered identifiers for server-initiated paths, but does not specify how to do that. As a result, it is much simpler than PR #329.

Close #328

Copy link
Contributor

@Yanmei-Liu Yanmei-Liu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks a lot for this new PR!
I totally support it, try to help fix a few typo issue.

draft-ietf-quic-multipath.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
draft-ietf-quic-multipath.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
draft-ietf-quic-multipath.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
draft-ietf-quic-multipath.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
huitema and others added 4 commits April 17, 2024 23:17
Co-authored-by: Yanmei Liu <healing4d@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Yanmei Liu <healing4d@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Yanmei Liu <healing4d@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Yanmei Liu <healing4d@gmail.com>
@huitema
Copy link
Contributor Author

huitema commented Apr 18, 2024

Thanks for the fixes, @Yanmei-Liu

Copy link
Contributor

@qdeconinck qdeconinck left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So I suppose then that receiving a MAX_PATHS with a Maximum Paths value of 0 leads to a connection error. A bit too bad, but I can live with that.

A small suggestion to make the example clearer, otherwise this looks good to me.

draft-ietf-quic-multipath.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-authored-by: Quentin De Coninck <quentin.deconinck@uclouvain.be>
@mirjak
Copy link
Collaborator

mirjak commented May 14, 2024

Do we generally have consensus for the even/odd split? Or do we need to confirm this on the list/in the interim before we merge?

As I just wrote in PR #329 I don't think we fully have consensus yet if we want to specify the server-initiated paths part in this doc or separately. However, I think think we can already merge this PR and keep discussing in PR #329.

@huitema
Copy link
Contributor Author

huitema commented Jun 4, 2024

Closing this PR after the 6/4/2024 interim.

@huitema huitema closed this Jun 4, 2024
@huitema huitema deleted the simply-even branch June 4, 2024 18:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Designing odd/even path-id, or not.
4 participants