New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[26.x] archive 26.1 release notes + backports #29899
Open
glozow
wants to merge
14
commits into
bitcoin:26.x
Choose a base branch
from
glozow:2024-04-26.2-backports
base: 26.x
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
+249
−71
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
To avoid issues with DNS blacklisting, I've setup a separate domain for my DNS seed. Github-Pull: bitcoin#29691 Rebased-From: 4f273ab
Github-Pull: bitcoin#29869 Rebased-From: c2e0489
The following sections might be updated with supplementary metadata relevant to reviewers and maintainers. Code CoverageFor detailed information about the code coverage, see the test coverage report. ReviewsSee the guideline for information on the review process. |
…oint Github-Pull: bitcoin#28554 Rebased-From: 9ac114e
dasibcryptoidology
approved these changes
Apr 28, 2024
glozow
force-pushed
the
2024-04-26.2-backports
branch
from
April 29, 2024 14:38
4fef05f
to
1f14790
Compare
Github-Pull: bitcoin#29767 Rebased-From: bbe82c1
glozow
force-pushed
the
2024-04-26.2-backports
branch
2 times, most recently
from
April 29, 2024 14:43
b467fd5
to
cb3ed23
Compare
This was referenced May 13, 2024
The issue is that compilation is done with `x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++-posix`, but then linking is done with `x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++`. I'm guessing this has been broken since bitcoin#24131 (01d1845), but have not checked. Fixes bitcoin#29734. Unblocks bitcoin#29527 (now DEBUG=1 builds can be tested). Github-Pull: bitcoin#29747 Rebased-From: b7e7e72
The script provided for signature might be externally provided, for instance by way of 'finalizepsbt'. Therefore the script might be ill-crafted, so don't assume pubkeys are always 32 bytes. Thanks to Niklas for finding this. Github-Pull: bitcoin#29853 Rebased-From: 4d8d213
Re-enable feature_init Github-Pull: bitcoin#29856 Rebased-From: fadf7e9
Pretty much all library packages were renamed in the 64-bit time_t migration to add `t64` (even on 64-bit platforms). Instead of complicating the doc with conditional package names, suggest installing the `-dev` packages which still have the same name, and besides that, are the right way to go about it as they contain the "user facing" C++ headers needed to build against Qt5. For Fedora, devel packages are already suggested. This affects Ubuntu 24.04 and Debian Testing. Github-Pull: bitcoin#29764 Rebased-From: a3c6a13
Fix CI build for t64 migration. Github-Pull: bitcoin#29764 Rebased-From: 6c29904
glozow
force-pushed
the
2024-04-26.2-backports
branch
from
May 13, 2024 16:22
cb3ed23
to
59cf8f7
Compare
This was referenced May 14, 2024
The 32 to 64-bit time_t transition causes a build failure in the built-in zlib about conflicting _TIME_BITS and _FILE_OFFSET_BITS. Note that zlib doesn't use time_t at all, so it is a false alarm. Take the following patch from upstream zlib: https://github.com/madler/zlib/commit/a566e156b3fa07b566ddbf6801b517a9dba04fa3.patch Closes bitcoin#29980. Github-Pull: bitcoin#29985 Rebased-From: 2e266f3
Without explicitly declaring the move, these UniValues get copied, causing increased memory usage. Fix this by explicitly moving the UniValue objects. Used by `rest_block` and `getblock` RPC. Github-Pull: bitcoin#30094 Rebased-From: b77bad3
Github-Pull: bitcoin#29870 Rebased-From: fa6ab0d
glozow
force-pushed
the
2024-04-26.2-backports
branch
from
May 14, 2024 10:36
59cf8f7
to
636588d
Compare
Propose the first commit of #30085 for backport. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Archives 26.1 release notes and adds draft release notes for 26.2rc1
Also backports: