Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 15, 2019. It is now read-only.

Adapting sendBeacon function for customizing output format of the request #21

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Adapting sendBeacon function for customizing output format of the request #21

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ninodafonte
Copy link

Refactoring of the sendBeacon function for having the option for customizing formatResponse inside plugins.

This open the posibilities for modifying the output format and adapt it to the required response.

I'm trying to keep the gathering of statistical data as fast as possible and the goal is to insert the data in some noSql engine or Hadoop framework with a single request letting me make some post-processing. To do that, the url has to be in a specific format.

That's the reason for customizing the url format. I hope this could be helpful for another purposes.

Best regards, thank you very much.

pd: sorry for the bunch of line changes. My editor kills spaces and change them for tabs. I just wrote a comment to make the pull request more clear.

… formatResponse inside plugins.

This open the posibilities for modifying the output format and adapt it to the required response.

Signed-off-by: Nino Dafonte <nino.dafonte@gmail.com>
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ boomr = {
}

name = ' ' + name + '=';

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please fix all the white space changes. might be best to pull in the latest code from upstream first. also remember that we use tabs for indentation everywhere except when aligning variables.

@bluesmoon
Copy link
Contributor

I think maybe this should be split into two. The StatsPlus plugin which only adds the new parameters will be one part. For the second part, we'll need to look at making this into a MVC pattern, where the formatter would be the view.

@ninodafonte
Copy link
Author

Yes, you are right,
I'll try to split this functionality as you say and i'll be back in a bit

thank you Philip!

@bluesmoon
Copy link
Contributor

Just wanted to let you know that this project is now at lognormal/boomerang, so would be good if you made your changes against that repository.

bluesmoon referenced this pull request in bluesmoon/boomerang Apr 2, 2015
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants