Skip to content

Visualization and Modeling of Shear Wave Splitting Observations in MATLAB

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

yvonnefroehlich/sws-visualization-and-modeling

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

59 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Visualization and Modeling of Shear Wave Splitting DOI

MATLAB functions for visualization and modeling of shear wave splitting observations:

Citation

If you make use of this material, please acknowledge the relating publications in which framework these functions were implemented:

Furthermore you can cite the Zenodo DOI given above.

Content

How to use: Header of function SWS_Analysis_BASICS_stereoplot.m

Example figures: Generated with the provided TEST_data_stereoplot

figures_SWS_stereo_README_BFO_orange_TEST

  • Under development

How to use: README; header of function SWS_modeling_calc_misfit.m
Details: Supporting Information of Grund & Ritter (2020)

  • Model types
    • Transverse isotropy
    • Structural anisotropy: one horizontal layer (H1), one dipping layer (T1), two horizontal layers (H2)
  • Forward calculation
    • Synthetic splitting parameters based on the energy minimization method (Silver & Chan 1991)
    • Ray theory reference frame
  • Observation (output of SplitLab and StackSplit)
  • Comparison of forward calculation and observation
    • Calculation and minimizing the root mean square error regarding the splitting parameters
    • Joint fitting of fast polarization direction and delay time, separate fitting of the fast polarization direction
  • Result visualization
    • Backazimuthal variation of the splitting parameters (forward calculation and observation)
    • Model type distribution (bar plot)
    • Model parameter distribution (scatter plot)
    • Stereoplot of synthetic splitting parameters (polar plot)
  • Result data
    • Model parameters for each model type as separate *.txt files

Example figures: Generated with the provided TEST_data_modeling

figure_SWS_modeling_README_BFO_orange_TEST

Requirements

Tested with: R2022a, R2021a,b under Linux and Windows

Releases

release publication Zenodo DOI
dev reflects main branch
v1.0 related to Ritter, Fröhlich, Sanz Alonso & Grund (2022) DOI

For details of the individual releases as well as for changes and differences compared to sws_tools by Michael Grund see the changelog.

Known Issues

  • Modeling of multi-event analysis: Only using either STACK or SIMW results is supported
  • Model parameter distribution for T1: Under development, not fully tested
  • Synthetic stereoplot for T1 and H2: Backazimuths of predicted nulls are partly wrong
  • Synthetic stereoplot for T1: Gray arrow is partly not exactly placed in the center

Contributing

For bug reports, suggestions or recommendations feel free to open an issue or submit a pull request directly here on GitHub.

References

Bowman, J. R. & Ando, M. (1987). Shear-wave splitting in the upper-mantle wedge above the Tonga subduction zone. Geophysical Journal International, volume 88, issue 1, pages 25-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1987.tb01367.x.

Crameri, F. (2021). Scientific colour maps, version 7.0.1. Zenodo. http://www.fabiocrameri.ch/colourmaps.php. https://zenodo.org/record/5501399.

Grund, M. (2017). StackSplit - a plugin for multi-event shear wave splitting analyses in SplitLab. Computers & Geosciences, volume 105, pages 43-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2017.04.015. versions 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 available at https://github.com/michaelgrund/stacksplit.

Grund, M. (2019). Exploring geodynamics at different depths with shear wave splitting. Dissertation, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT). https://doi.org/10.5445/IR/1000091425.

Grund, M. & Ritter, J. R. R. (2020). Shear-wave splitting beneath Fennoscandia – evidence for dipping structures and laterally varying multilayer anisotropy. Geophysical Journal International, volume 223, pages 1525-1547. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggaa388.

Porritt, R. W. (2014). SplitLab version 1.2.1. available at https://robporritt.wordpress.com/software/.

Restivo, A. & Helffrich, G. (1999). Teleseismic shear wave splitting measurements in noisy environments. Geophysical Journal International, volume 137, pages 821-830. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246x.1999.00845.x.

Roy, C., Winter, A., Ritter, J. R. R. & Schweitzer, J. (2017). On the improvement of SKS splitting measurements by the Simultaneous Inversion of Multiple Waveforms (SIMW). Geophysical Journal International, volume 208, pages 1508-1523. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggw470.

Silver, P. G. & Chan, W. W. (1991). Shear wave splitting and subcontinental mantle deformation. Journal of Geophysical Research, volume 96, issue B10, pages 16429-16454. https://doi.org/10.1029/91JB00899.

Thyng, K. M., Greene, C. A., Hetland, R. D., Zimmerle, H. M. & DiMarco, S. F. (2016). True colors of oceanography: Guidelines for effective and accurate colormap selection. Oceanography, volume 29, issue 3, pages 9-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2016.66.

Walker, A. M. & Wookey, J. (2012). MSAT — A new toolkit for the analysis of elastic and seismic anisotropy. Computer & Geosciences, volume 49, pages 81-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2012.05.031. available at https://www1.gly.bris.ac.uk/MSAT/, https://github.com/andreww/MSAT.

Wolfe, C. J. & Silver, P. G. (1998). Seismic anisotropy of oceanic upper mantle: Shear wave splitting methodologies and observations. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, volume 103, issue B1, pages 749-771. https://doi.org/10.1029/97JB02023.

Wüstefeld, A., Bokelmann, G., Zaroli, C. & Barruol, G. (2008). SplitLab: A shear-wave splitting environment in Matlab. Computers & Geosciences, volume 34, issue 5, pages 515-528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2007.08.002. version 1.0.5 available at http://splitting.gm.univ-montp2.fr and version 1.9.0 available at https://github.com/IPGP/splitlab.