Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test suite without dask #422

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: grid_ufunc_refactor_project
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

TomNicholas
Copy link
Contributor

@TomNicholas TomNicholas commented Feb 4, 2022

Removes dask from the "core dependencies" CI environment file, so that no we have a CI run that tests everything without dask installed.

I altered an existing run rather than added a new run because this seemed to better fit the intention of "just core dependencies".

I don't expect this to pass - but we can push to this branch to start fixing any bugs that this reveals.

@TomNicholas TomNicholas changed the base branch from master to grid_ufunc_refactor_project February 4, 2022 17:36
@TomNicholas
Copy link
Contributor Author

Wait why didn't the CI run the code tests??

@jbusecke
Copy link
Contributor

jbusecke commented Feb 4, 2022

Umm that is weird...no idea why this wouldnt work...

@TomNicholas TomNicholas changed the title Test no dask Test suite without dask Feb 16, 2022
@jbusecke
Copy link
Contributor

Do you envision this being part of 0.7.0? I would say this is probably more suited for the next round where we modify tests substantially?

@TomNicholas
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think this is low-priority, and can wait until we have finalised the internals based on other criteria.

@TomNicholas TomNicholas deleted the branch xgcm:grid_ufunc_refactor_project April 20, 2022 20:57
@jbusecke
Copy link
Contributor

Not sure this should be closed. Could be part of #466

@TomNicholas
Copy link
Contributor Author

The only reason this was closed is because when I tried deleting the grid_ufunc_refactor_project branch it auto-closed every PR which built off that branch.

@jbusecke jbusecke reopened this Apr 25, 2022
@jbusecke
Copy link
Contributor

Ok then ill reopen so we can keep track of it

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants