Smart scan #2200
Smart scan #2200
Conversation
|
I see there are some tests failing...not too surprising since I can't actually run the tests with my setup (MSYS on Win10). What is the "official" setup used by the devs? I haven't had any luck getting |
…or file separators
…without necessarily needing to understand the other commands on the line
… do things like re-add command processors
nickmayer
force-pushed
the
smart-scan
branch
2 times, most recently
from
d49a74c
to
6cf1289
Compare
Scan more intelligently and use a separate retract value to speed things up significantly. Automatically apply the command processor if there is valid data.
|
Sorry for the lack of response on this. I'm currently rebuilding my machine and have ordered a decent probe to test this out. I'll take care of the merge conflict. |
|
I have now finally tried this and it seems to work fine. I needed to revert the changes to the There was also a place where you added a double value comparison. This did in certain cases not work because double values are not exact or that there could be rounding errors reported from the controller. I had to add a double compare function with a minimum error threshold. I was thinking of creating a PR to your branch, but it got pretty messy with all changes coming from master. So I'll close this and create a new PR. Thanks for your contribution! |
Reworked the auto leveler to be a lot smarter about scanning resulting in a huge speedup. Also change UI to make it a lot less likely you'll forget to apply your scanned heightmap to your gcode.