Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Adopt concurrent.futures in place of multiprocessing #194

Open
widdowquinn opened this issue Jun 6, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Adopt concurrent.futures in place of multiprocessing #194

widdowquinn opened this issue Jun 6, 2020 · 0 comments
Assignees
@widdowquinn
Labels
enhancement something we'd like pyani to do that it doesn't already performance the issue relates to making pyani more efficient
Projects
pyani
Milestone
0.3.0

Comments

@widdowquinn
Copy link
Owner

Summary:

The new Python3 concurrent.futures interface can replace multiprocessing with a cleaner interface and more control/usability.
@widdowquinn widdowquinn added enhancement something we'd like pyani to do that it doesn't already performance the issue relates to making pyani more efficient labels Jun 6, 2020
@widdowquinn widdowquinn added this to the 0.3.0 milestone Jun 6, 2020
@widdowquinn widdowquinn self-assigned this Jun 6, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@widdowquinn widdowquinn

Labels
enhancement something we'd like pyani to do that it doesn't already performance the issue relates to making pyani more efficient
Projects
pyani
  
Awaiting triage
Milestone
0.3.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@widdowquinn