Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Optimize FuncType allocations #1026

Merged
merged 2 commits into from May 11, 2024
Merged

Optimize FuncType allocations #1026

merged 2 commits into from May 11, 2024

Conversation

Robbepop
Copy link
Member

@Robbepop Robbepop commented May 11, 2024

Previously the alloc method was optimized for FuncTypes that already existed which was quite uncommon. Now it is optimized for the opposite case.
Compilation benchmarks show small improvements all in all.

Previously the alloc method was optimized for FuncTypes that already existed which was quite uncommon. Now it is optimized for the opposite case.
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 11, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 80.83%. Comparing base (2e7a28f) to head (c1bd2da).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1026      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   80.79%   80.83%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         269      269              
  Lines       24802    24801       -1     
==========================================
+ Hits        20040    20047       +7     
+ Misses       4762     4754       -8     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Robbepop Robbepop merged commit f3e148f into master May 11, 2024
17 checks passed
@Robbepop Robbepop deleted the rf-opt-func-type-alloc branch May 11, 2024 13:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant