10th tutorial video review

[handealptekin]

Please use the following for reviews: https://murf.ai/share/loroxo5j

[netlify]

❌ Deploy Preview for whatiswot failed.

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	fc9a0e0
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/whatiswot/deploys/655d14cf0eafcb0008e01188

[FadySalama]

I am not sure about the pronunciation of DECT ULE and Wi-SUN (See 2:00). I think ULE should at least be spelled. @egekorkan Do you know how they are usually pronounced?

[egekorkan]

I would say we simply remove those two examples. They are a bit corner case and it would be difficult to back them up with TDs later on.

[egekorkan]

the smart home wiggles but the others don't? Also, there should be a bit more pause after smart cities before moving to next slide

[handealptekin]

smart home was wiggling to show it was being presented next. should i make them all wiggle instead or none of them should wiggle?

[egekorkan]

The wiggling should happen just before the transition in second 59.

[handealptekin]

All of the requested changes have been made except the "wiggling" issue. I will proceed with the further feedback on that. Video can be reviewed from the same link.
I also added the new outro to the end.

[egekorkan]

The important feedback is addressed. One pronunciation and animation fix is still needed. Afterwards, I will ask feedback from @relu91 .

[handealptekin]

I delayed the wiggle until 00:54 and revised the pronunciation of PCs (however I am not sure of if it is okay). Please review the updated link.

[egekorkan]

The wiggle should be a bit later but the animation is too fast (or talking is too slow). The sentence should finish before wiggling and then the transition to the inside of the home starts.

[handealptekin]

I added more delay to the wiggle and updated the video.

[egekorkan]

All my concerns are addressed, we will wait for @relu91 review before merging.

[relu91]

A generic comment about use cases. I video explains correctly the different use cases but it fails to convey what WoT can do for the different domains. It is like we are explaining well- known IoT use cases. We are listing different protocols in the description why don't explicitly say that this diversity make difficult to create one-fit-all solutions?

[relu91]

The animations here feel out of sync with the text. The sentence starts by mentioning the W3C but the animation shows a document structure and only after a few seconds shows the consortium animation. It is like the video can't keep up with what is narrated. Maybe We should choose one of the two animations?

[egekorkan]

Let's do such that we move the W3C mention to the end of the sentence. If it is still too fast, we can remove the W3C slide/animation.

[egekorkan]

A generic comment about use cases. I video explains correctly the different use cases but it fails to convey what WoT can do for the different domains. It is like we are explaining well- known IoT use cases. We are listing different protocols in the description why don't explicitly say that this diversity make difficult to create one-fit-all solutions?

So this was inspired from the architecture document since it also starts in this generic fashion. So I propose to do the following changes:

• Before starting with the use cases, we mention that WoT works for "all" IoT use cases, such as...
• At the end of each use case, we mention how WoT relates to this:
  • WoT supports the architectures we showed since it supports local, edge and cloud connectivity, while integrating various protocols.
  • (same as above but rephrase intelligently) but also clearly mentioning that we support industrial protocols (smart home is more generic).
  • Agriculture: Not sure what to add at the end
  • Smart City: WoT works will in smart cities since it helps avoiding vendor lock-in by relying on open standards to achieve interoperability in spite of a big number of subsystems.