Updates to SoTD to invite wide review of the document #260
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Updates to the Status of This Document section of the document to point out the main changes since last publication, and calls out for a wide review of the document. I mentioned a couple of issues (passing language settings and congestion control mechanism) as examples of remaining issues.
|
@tidoust Thanks! This looks great to me. |
anssiko
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 5, 2016
Updates to SoTD to invite wide review of the document
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Updates to the Status of This Document section of the document to point out the main changes since last publication, and calls out for a wide review of the document, as agreed in #244.
I mentioned a couple of issues (passing language settings and congestion control mechanism) as examples of remaining issues. Let me know if you feel that comes out of the blue and if the text should rather remain generic.
I noted exchanges with other W3C groups but did not explicitly list the horizontal reviews that have already been completed. I do not think they need to appear in the Status of This Document directly. We'll be able to point relevant people to these reviews when we consider transitioning to Candidate Recommendation.
PS: I used the undocumented "sotdAfterWGinfo" ReSpec flag to have the custom paragraph appear next to the "This document was published by..." paragraph, as that seems to flow more naturally.
PPS: I also dropped the "afterEnd" post-processing in ReSpec, since the underlying bug has now been fixed.