Added Antarctica in country for mobile validation #1761

[Sambhavmahajan11]

Added Antarctica in country for mobile validation #1761
Also updated the readme

Checklist

• [✅ ] PR contains only changes related; no stray files, etc.
• [ ✅] README updated (where applicable)
• Tests written (where applicable)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Base: 100.00% // Head: 100.00% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (3116122) compared to base (531dc7f).
Patch has no changes to coverable lines.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master     #2092   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files          104       104           
  Lines         2308      2308           
  Branches       578       578           
=========================================
  Hits          2308      2308           

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/lib/isMobilePhone.js	100.00% <ø> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[WikiRik]

Don't forget to add tests

[WikiRik]

I didn't look into the RegEx itself yesterday but it seems that the Artic bases do not really have their own phone numbers.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_country_calling_codes does mention that + 672 1x is for the Australian Antartic Territory and in the table https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_country_calling_codes#Locations_with_no_country_code it shows that the other bases are dialed based on their parent country.

Also I would not be sure how often this would be used, so I would recommend against merging this PR

[Sambhavmahajan11]

This my first pr could u please approve
I will make better ones in the near future.

[pano9000]

@Sambhavmahajan11 thank you for the PR, but I also do not see any real value in this PR, as this seems to be too much of a niche use case (if at all).
After all, from what I know, the people in the Antartic Territories are not really permanent "residents", but rather temporary inhabitants.

I would too rather see this as a "Won't Do" as well.

@profnandaa would you agree to close this issue?

[profnandaa]

@pano9000 -- good by me, we can close.

[pano9000]

@Sambhavmahajan11 again, thanks for the PR, but I need to close this PR, kindly see above for the reasons.