UTS46 valid: use IDS not Block=IDC #820
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
markusicu
requested review from
echeran,
Manishearth,
macchiati,
asmusf,
nedley and
josh-hadley
|
PS: I ran the tool and checked that there are no changes in the generated data file. |
|
Anyone please? |
nedley
approved these changes
May 14, 2024
|
Thanks @nedley ! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Code version of
[178-A25] Action Item for Markus Scherer, Mark Davis, PAG: In UTS#46 section 6 step 2 “Specify the base valid set” replace the removal of \p{Block=Ideographic_Description_Characters} and \u31EF with the removal of [\p{IDS_Unary_Operator}\p{IDS_Binary_Operator}\p{IDS_Trinary_Operator}]. For Unicode Version 16.0. See L2/24-009 item 7.2.