Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed saver relative paths for latest_checkpoint #573

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Fixed saver relative paths for latest_checkpoint #573

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

MarkDaoust
Copy link
Member

This would be cleaner if we made all paths listed in the "latest"
file relative to the its directory, allowing the removal of the
added os.path.isabs checks.

That would make the os.join in saver.latest_checkpoint much less
surprising.

But at least this way, there is no effect on currently working code.

Fixes #571
Change-Id: I47d8536b9b2ed3dcc193d6e6b7f4573a4e22c9b3

@tensorflow-jenkins
Copy link
Collaborator

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@vrv
Copy link

vrv commented Dec 21, 2015

Let me try kicking off the test for this PR by saying some magic words

@vrv
Copy link

vrv commented Dec 21, 2015

test this please

@vrv vrv assigned sherrym and unassigned sherrym Dec 21, 2015
@vrv
Copy link

vrv commented Dec 21, 2015

Looks generally fine, assigning to Sherry, the original reviewer.

@vrv
Copy link

vrv commented Jan 4, 2016

@tensorflow-jenkins, test this please.

@vrv
Copy link

vrv commented Jan 4, 2016

(Can you squash the commits if the tests are all passing?)

This would be cleaner if we made all paths listed in the "latest"
file relative to the its directory, allowing the removal of the
added `os.path.isabs` checks.

That would make the `os.join` in `saver.latest_checkpoint` much less
surprising.

But at least this way, there is no effect on currently working code.

Fixes #571
Change-Id: I47d8536b9b2ed3dcc193d6e6b7f4573a4e22c9b3
@MarkDaoust
Copy link
Member Author

Done. Rebased on master.

@vrv
Copy link

vrv commented Jan 6, 2016

@tensorflow-jenkins, test this please.

vrv pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 8, 2016
@vrv
Copy link

vrv commented Jan 8, 2016

Merged (trying a new workflow where I merge manually via rebasing rather than clicking the button for a better history).

@vrv vrv closed this Jan 8, 2016
darkbuck pushed a commit to darkbuck/tensorflow that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2020
…pstream-zyin-fix-cuda-xla-linker-error

[XLA:GPU] Reverting cuda->gpu symbol change in cuda runtime
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants