Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(bundler): Use arch instead of llvm_target. fix #3285 #3286

Merged
merged 6 commits into from Feb 5, 2022

Conversation

JonasKruckenberg
Copy link
Contributor

The llvm target misidentified the arch on apple silicon, causing sidecar bundling to fail.
This fixes #3285.

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bugfix
  • Feature
  • Docs
  • New Binding issue #___
  • Code style update
  • Refactor
  • Build-related changes
  • Other, please describe:

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes, and the changes were approved in issue #___
  • No

Checklist

  • When resolving issues, they are referenced in the PR's title (e.g fix #___, #___)
  • A change file is added if any packages will require a version bump due to this PR per the instructions in the readme.
  • I have added a convincing reason for adding this feature, if necessary

Other information

The llvm target misidentified the arch on apple silicon, causing sidecar bundling to fail.
This fixes #3285.
@JonasKruckenberg JonasKruckenberg requested a review from a team January 26, 2022 10:52
@lucasfernog
Copy link
Member

I see you didn't change the command to rustc --print cfg as stated on the issue. Is that intentional?

@JonasKruckenberg
Copy link
Contributor Author

I see you didn't change the command to rustc --print cfg as stated on the issue. Is that intentional?

nope, just didn't get to it yet bc the parsing is a bit more involved

Replaces the nightly (and undocumented?) `RUSTC_BOOTSTRAP=1 rustc -Z unstable-options --print target-spec-json` with `rustc --print cfg` which is on the public interface, documented and fully uses stable rust
@JonasKruckenberg JonasKruckenberg requested a review from a team January 29, 2022 12:52
@JonasKruckenberg JonasKruckenberg requested a review from a team as a code owner January 29, 2022 12:54
@lucasfernog lucasfernog merged commit 839daec into next Feb 5, 2022
@lucasfernog lucasfernog deleted the fix/incorrect-llvm-target branch February 5, 2022 03:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[bug] Incorrect llvm target
2 participants