Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: Refactor the StorageExplorerStore to use API calls from the data folder #23222

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ivasilov
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@ivasilov ivasilov requested a review from a team as a code owner April 24, 2024 12:40
Copy link

supabase bot commented Apr 24, 2024

No changes detected in supabase directory.
This pull request has been ignored for the connected project xguihxuzqibwxjnimxev due to its connection settings.
Go to Project Integrations Settings ↗︎ in order to change this behavior.


Branching Preview Branches by Supabase.
Learn more about Supabase for Git ↗︎.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Apr 24, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
studio-staging ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Apr 25, 2024 0:54am
6 Ignored Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
database-new ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Apr 25, 2024 0:54am
docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Apr 25, 2024 0:54am
studio ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Apr 25, 2024 0:54am
studio-self-hosted ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Apr 25, 2024 0:54am
ui-storybook ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Apr 25, 2024 0:54am
zone-www-dot-com ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Apr 25, 2024 0:54am

Comment on lines +33 to +37
export function useBucketObjectDeleteMutation() {
return useMutation({
mutationFn: deleteBucketObject,
})
}
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For all these new mutation functions is there a reason why we're not passing through the options like in the other mutations? Makes it easy to pass onSuccess() from outside for example

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants