Indexing new providers contracts

[tuler]

Squid implementation of indexing of application nodes.

We can also consider to merge this with the indexing done for the rollups-explorer, because they have a lot in common. We can see this as a layer on top of that.

Check contracts at #233

[changeset-bot]

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 2dbdb5e

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
docs	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Jan 31, 2024 6:01pm
www	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Jan 31, 2024 6:01pm

[socket-security]

New dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

Package	New capabilities	Transitives	Size	Publisher
npm/@subsquid/evm-typegen@3.2.2	Transitive: environment, filesystem, network, shell	+14	13.7 MB	subsquid

View full report↗︎

[tuler]

If we merge this to the schema of the cartesi rollups explorer index this is what it would look like:

[brunomenezes]

If we merge this to the schema of the cartesi rollups explorer index this is what it would look like:

Schema

That is good. I see no problem with that coexisting inside the rollups-explorer-api project.

[tuler]

This will go back to the design board. Possibly as part of cartesi/rollups-explorer-api#24