Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make CC port configurable in KafkaRebalanceAssemblyOperator #10096

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 15, 2024

Conversation

fvaleri
Copy link
Contributor

@fvaleri fvaleri commented May 10, 2024

Related to this PR comment.

Signed-off-by: Federico Valeri <fedevaleri@gmail.com>
@fvaleri fvaleri requested review from ppatierno and scholzj and removed request for ppatierno May 10, 2024 12:00
@fvaleri fvaleri added this to the 0.42.0 milestone May 10, 2024
@ppatierno
Copy link
Member

@fvaleri why there was the need to make the CC port configurable? Just a genuine question ... maybe tests were failing with the default CC port not free and the need to find a free one? I haven't never seen a failure for that.

@fvaleri
Copy link
Contributor Author

fvaleri commented May 13, 2024

maybe tests were failing with the default CC port not free and the need to find a free one? I haven't never seen a failure for that.

In general, CC "standard" port (9090) is fairly common, and could be already in use by another process on your machine. This change avoids this potential port conflict, and makes these tests more robust. It's already implemented that way in other tests.

Copy link
Member

@ppatierno ppatierno left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Thanks!

@scholzj
Copy link
Member

scholzj commented May 14, 2024

/azp run regression

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

Signed-off-by: Federico Valeri <fedevaleri@gmail.com>
@scholzj scholzj merged commit f83de1a into strimzi:main May 15, 2024
13 checks passed
@fvaleri fvaleri deleted the cc-port branch May 15, 2024 09:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants