Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Indicate that offset/exposure was used in GLM summary #2002

Open
kshedden opened this issue Sep 25, 2014 · 5 comments
Open

Indicate that offset/exposure was used in GLM summary #2002

kshedden opened this issue Sep 25, 2014 · 5 comments

Comments

@kshedden
Copy link
Contributor

Currently there is nothing in the printed summary of the model fit to inform/remind you that an offset was used when fitting the model.

@josef-pkt
Copy link
Member

I think we might have to parameterize a bit that additional information gets added to the summary.
When I looked yesterday at LASSO, I also didn't see any specific information about the penalization in the summary.

AFAIR, fit_constrained also doesn't provide the extra information about the constraints.

@josef-pkt
Copy link
Member

offset and exposure is easier, because it applies to all fit (or our main fit) for which summary is designed for.

I think Stata adds these to the params table without filling out the inference columns.

@josef-pkt josef-pkt added this to the 0.15 milestone Apr 12, 2024
@josef-pkt
Copy link
Member

see also #9100 and #9130

@josef-pkt
Copy link
Member

josef-pkt commented May 25, 2024

#9130 has been merged and adds attributes with the names of the extra arrays offset, ...

adding to summary should be relatively easy

discrete models are still missing the names of the attributes and adding it to the summary

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants