Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Give the CSSWG a custom triage heuristic. #27

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Mar 5, 2024
Merged

Conversation

jyasskin
Copy link
Collaborator

@jyasskin jyasskin commented Mar 5, 2024

Since they don't have any auto-labeling system or
issue templates, if an issue has a label, then
someone with the ability to triage it has touched
it, so we can consider it triaged.

Fixes #22.

@fantasai, @astearns, this takes CSS from 733 untriaged issues to 51. Does this seem like the right change to make instead of marking all open issues with Priority: Eventually?

https://speced.github.io/spec-maintenance/w3c/csswg-drafts/ vs

w3c/csswg-drafts Issues

Untriaged

Since they don't have any auto-labeling system or
issue templates, if an issue has a label, then
someone with the ability to triage it has touched
it, so we can consider it triaged.
@astearns
Copy link

astearns commented Mar 5, 2024

Yes, I think this is a good change as these 51 are likely the most in need of attention. When we get through this list we can look at further updates. There is probably a set of issues that have a label (added by the original issue author) but where no one else has looked at them. That might be the next bucket to tackle.

I see that there are both issues and PRs in this list. Is that intended?

@jyasskin
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jyasskin commented Mar 5, 2024

Yes, right now the tool treats issues and PRs identically, and I haven't found a reason to second-guess that behavior. :)

@svgeesus
Copy link

svgeesus commented Mar 5, 2024

Fixed

@svgeesus
Copy link

svgeesus commented Mar 5, 2024

And this one, which should have been closed in 2018

@svgeesus
Copy link

svgeesus commented Mar 5, 2024

@svgeesus
Copy link

svgeesus commented Mar 5, 2024

Copy link

@svgeesus svgeesus left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks Good To Me

@jyasskin jyasskin merged commit 909ac60 into main Mar 5, 2024
2 checks passed
@jyasskin jyasskin deleted the custom-triage-heuristic branch March 5, 2024 14:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Default issues with any label to "Priority: Eventually"
3 participants