Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use rollup to simplify build/babel/lint #282

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

Use rollup to simplify build/babel/lint #282

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

jsg2021
Copy link
Contributor

@jsg2021 jsg2021 commented Jan 31, 2020

supersedes #243, #275.
includes #281

This updates all devDependencies to latest (as of now) and removes the need for any babel-runtime dependencies (rollup bakes them in & dedups them for us) This also moves zuul to a npx (on demand) script (since it prints many deprecation warnings atm) The only deprecation warning on install is core-js@2 (which comes from a babel-transform plugin)

Thoughts?

With this change, rollup produces both cjs & umd bundles. npm test passes.

@jsg2021
Copy link
Contributor Author

jsg2021 commented Jan 31, 2020

I just noticed #243 ... this maybe a cleaner approach. I made this produce the cjs/umd instead of producing an es module... This makes the original src/ the es code...and the cjs/umd the "fallbacks".

@jsg2021
Copy link
Contributor Author

jsg2021 commented Jan 31, 2020

since the umd is nearly ident to the cjs, I could just make the main point to the umd. and stop producing the /lib/index.js... that way there is only one fallback that covers browser & node (cjs).

@josephfrazier josephfrazier self-requested a review February 4, 2020 21:20
@jsg2021
Copy link
Contributor Author

jsg2021 commented Feb 12, 2020

I've rebased onto your master.

@jsg2021
Copy link
Contributor Author

jsg2021 commented Feb 13, 2020

I've updated this to incorporate yesterdays comments from #243 ... I've also fully commented the rollup config.

incorporate comments:
- Don't publish src.
- Rollup produces both umd and esm outputs.
@jsg2021
Copy link
Contributor Author

jsg2021 commented Aug 6, 2020

Squashed & rebased. Hope this is found useful :)

@slevithan
Copy link
Owner

slevithan commented Nov 18, 2020

This sounds good, but I'm not actively supporting XRegExp these days and I'm not very familiar with the details of cjs/umd/esm, rollup, babel, etc., so I'd appreciate insight from @josephfrazier or others.

@jsg2021
Copy link
Contributor Author

jsg2021 commented Nov 18, 2020

This should probably be inverted to produce a commonjs & umd build instead of esm & umd... let modern node have the raw sources.

This pull request was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants