Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(repos): fix namings after salt binaries and keys move #561

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sticky-note
Copy link
Member

@sticky-note sticky-note commented Feb 1, 2024

BREAKING CHANGES: This commit changes upstream repository naming conventions to get latest binaries and keys. If you depends on versions of salt from older, please stick with version 1.x.x of this formula

Fixup of some requested changes from #548
as we need this to work in order to unbreak formula for new versions of Salt

PR progress checklist (to be filled in by reviewers)

  • Changes to documentation are appropriate (or tick if not required)
  • Changes to tests are appropriate (or tick if not required)
  • Reviews completed

What type of PR is this?

Primary type

  • [build] Changes related to the build system
  • [chore] Changes to the build process or auxiliary tools and libraries such as documentation generation
  • [ci] Changes to the continuous integration configuration
  • [feat] A new feature
  • [fix] A bug fix
  • [perf] A code change that improves performance
  • [refactor] A code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature
  • [revert] A change used to revert a previous commit
  • [style] Changes that do not affect the meaning of the code (white-space, formatting, missing semi-colons, etc.)

Secondary type

  • [docs] Documentation changes
  • [test] Adding missing or correcting existing tests

Does this PR introduce a BREAKING CHANGE?

Yes

Related issues and/or pull requests

Describe the changes you're proposing

Pillar / config required to test the proposed changes

Debug log showing how the proposed changes work

Documentation checklist

  • Updated the README (e.g. Available states).
  • Updated pillar.example.

Testing checklist

  • Included in Kitchen (i.e. under state_top).
  • Covered by new/existing tests (e.g. InSpec, Serverspec, etc.).
  • Updated the relevant test pillar.

Additional context

BREAKING CHANGES: This commit changes upstream repository naming conventions
to get latest binaries and keys. If you depends on versions of salt from older,
please stick with version 1.x.x of this formula
@lelutin
Copy link

lelutin commented Mar 7, 2024

Thanks @sticky-note for tackling the problems with the move of the repo key. The current code on the master branch is not working properly because of this.

I don't feel qualified to add feedback on the code changes as a whole though since there are more changes than what I would currently use.

pkgrepo_keyring: '{{ salt_repo }}/{{ py_ver_repr or 'py3' }}/{{ osfamily_lower }}/{{ osmajorrelease }}/amd64/{{ salt_release }}/salt-archive-keyring.gpg'
pkgrepo_keyring_hash: sha256=ea38e0cdbd8dc53e1af154a8d711a2a321a69f81188062dc5cde9d54df2b8c47
pkgrepo: 'deb [signed-by=/usr/share/keyrings/salt-archive-keyring.gpg arch={{ repoarch }}] {{ salt_repo }}/{{ py_ver_repr or 'py3' }}/{{ osfamily_lower }}/{{ osmajorrelease }}/{{ repoarch }}/{{ salt_release }} {{ oscodename }} main'
pkgrepo_keyring: '{{ salt_repo }}/{{ py_ver_repr or 'py3' }}/{{ osfamily_lower }}/{{ osmajorrelease }}/amd64/{{ salt_release }}/SALT-PROJECT-GPG-PUBKEY-2023.gpg'

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

New PGP url also has arch in path. Should update to use the new osarch.

@primechuck
Copy link

I was starting a PR for this, but saw yours which is much more inclusive. Any additional changes for this so we don't have to override pillar data to get salt to deploy salt?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants