Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[WIP] Store downloads in timescale #3560

Draft
wants to merge 12 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

segiddins
Copy link
Member

@segiddins segiddins commented Mar 9, 2023

@jchestershopify
Copy link
Contributor

Is there an issue I could look at?

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 3, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #3560 (3e43db3) into master (5487e75) will decrease coverage by 0.03%.
The diff coverage is 97.29%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3560      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   98.74%   98.72%   -0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         199      204       +5     
  Lines        4953     5023      +70     
==========================================
+ Hits         4891     4959      +68     
- Misses         62       64       +2     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
app/avo/resources/download_resource.rb 93.75% <93.75%> (ø)
app/jobs/fastly_log_processor.rb 98.38% <96.42%> (-1.62%) ⬇️
app/controllers/avo/downloads_controller.rb 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
app/models/download.rb 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
app/models/download_record.rb 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
app/policies/download_policy.rb 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

@segiddins segiddins force-pushed the segiddins/store-downloads-in-timescale branch from fcd2c14 to 6ee76d4 Compare April 4, 2023 18:56
@jamessewell
Copy link

Is there any progress on this PR? I run Developer Advocacy at Timescale, and I'd love to help out anywhere I can! We ❤️ Ruby, and we ❤️ what RubyGems does for the ecosystem.

Looking at the RFC drawbacks section there are several things I can assist with off the bat:

  • We now have a Terraform provider ☁️
  • I'm happy to chat about some sort of partnership (jsewell @ companyname)
  • I'm happy to do ask an advocate to test the data compression and continuous aggregate performance on your data so you know we are good fit 😄

@segiddins
Copy link
Member Author

@jamessewell I've had severely reduced hours to work on RubyGems things the past few months, and most of my time has been dedicated to more security-related work (mainly the OIDC stuff), as well as stability work. I'd like to pick this back up once I have full-time hours again to devote to RubyGems work.

@jonatas
Copy link

jonatas commented Apr 15, 2024

Hey folks, I see that we'll have a hackathon day and I'd love to work on this one as I'm already a few years on the Timescaledb side and with RubyGems support, I think we could easily move it into a reviewable state.

@simi
Copy link
Member

simi commented Apr 15, 2024

Hello @jonatas, currently this was put on hold. I'm available to hop on call and discuss current setup and possibilities. I would prefer smaller incremental contribution over one huge PR if possible. I'm happy to help. Feel free to ping me here or at bundler Slack.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants