drift with rpi camera v2 and mpu9250 on jetson nano

[omeredemen]

hello i am trying openvins on jetson nano
camera: raspberry pi camera v2
imu: mpu9250
and the system:

I collected 3 hours imu data to calculate allan variance parameters. And here are parameters

accelerometer_noise_density: 0.05166104637481483
accelerometer_random_walk: 0.00995698308
gyroscope_noise_density: 0.1495249516640554
gyroscope_random_walk: 0.00844715901
rostopic: '/imu' #Make sure this is correct
update_rate: 100.0 #Make sure this is correct

And i handled camera and camera-imu calibration with kalibr here is the calibration results:
results.zip

I edited kalibr_imu_chain.yaml and kalibr_imucam_chain.yaml files with calibration values. Also i change some parameters in estimator_config.yaml file that i copied from euroc_mav/estimator_config.yaml. Here is my estimator_config.yaml file:

%YAML:1.0 # need to specify the file type at the top!

verbosity: "INFO" # ALL, DEBUG, INFO, WARNING, ERROR, SILENT

use_fej: true # if first-estimate Jacobians should be used (enable for good consistency)
integration: "rk4" # discrete, rk4, analytical (if rk4 or analytical used then analytical covariance propagation is used)
use_stereo: false # if we have more than 1 camera, if we should try to track stereo constraints between pairs
max_cameras: 1 # how many cameras we have 1 = mono, 2 = stereo, >2 = binocular (all mono tracking)

calib_cam_extrinsics: true # if the transform between camera and IMU should be optimized R_ItoC, p_CinI
calib_cam_intrinsics: true # if camera intrinsics should be optimized (focal, center, distortion)
calib_cam_timeoffset: true # if timeoffset between camera and IMU should be optimized
calib_imu_intrinsics: false # if imu intrinsics should be calibrated (rotation and skew-scale matrix)
calib_imu_g_sensitivity: false # if gyroscope gravity sensitivity (Tg) should be calibrated

max_clones: 8 # how many clones in the sliding window
max_slam: 40 # number of features in our state vector
max_slam_in_update: 25 # update can be split into sequential updates of batches, how many in a batch
max_msckf_in_update: 40 # how many MSCKF features to use in the update
dt_slam_delay: 1 # delay before initializing (helps with stability from bad initialization...)

gravity_mag: 9.81 # magnitude of gravity in this location

feat_rep_msckf: "GLOBAL_3D"
feat_rep_slam: "ANCHORED_MSCKF_INVERSE_DEPTH"
feat_rep_aruco: "ANCHORED_MSCKF_INVERSE_DEPTH"

# zero velocity update parameters we can use
# we support either IMU-based or disparity detection.
try_zupt: false
zupt_chi2_multipler: 0 # set to 0 for only disp-based
zupt_max_velocity: 0.1
zupt_noise_multiplier: 10
zupt_max_disparity: 0.5 # set to 0 for only imu-based
zupt_only_at_beginning: false

# ==================================================================
# ==================================================================

init_window_time: 1.0 # how many seconds to collect initialization information
init_imu_thresh: 0.5 # threshold for variance of the accelerometer to detect a "jerk" in motion
init_max_disparity: 10.0 # max disparity to consider the platform stationary (dependent on resolution)
init_max_features: 50 # how many features to track during initialization (saves on computation)

init_dyn_use: false # if dynamic initialization should be used
init_dyn_mle_opt_calib: false # if we should optimize calibration during intialization (not recommended)
init_dyn_mle_max_iter: 50 # how many iterations the MLE refinement should use (zero to skip the MLE)
init_dyn_mle_max_time: 0.05 # how many seconds the MLE should be completed in
init_dyn_mle_max_threads: 6 # how many threads the MLE should use
init_dyn_num_pose: 6 # number of poses to use within our window time (evenly spaced)
init_dyn_min_deg: 10.0 # orientation change needed to try to init

init_dyn_inflation_ori: 10 # what to inflate the recovered q_GtoI covariance by
init_dyn_inflation_vel: 100 # what to inflate the recovered v_IinG covariance by
init_dyn_inflation_bg: 10 # what to inflate the recovered bias_g covariance by
init_dyn_inflation_ba: 100 # what to inflate the recovered bias_a covariance by
init_dyn_min_rec_cond: 1e-12 # reciprocal condition number thresh for info inversion

init_dyn_bias_g: [ 0.0, 0.0, 0.0 ] # initial gyroscope bias guess
init_dyn_bias_a: [ 0.0, 0.0, 0.0 ] # initial accelerometer bias guess

# ==================================================================
# ==================================================================

record_timing_information: false # if we want to record timing information of the method
record_timing_filepath: "/tmp/traj_timing.txt" # https://docs.openvins.com/eval-timing.html#eval-ov-timing-flame

# if we want to save the simulation state and its diagional covariance
# use this with rosrun ov_eval error_simulation
save_total_state: false
filepath_est: "/tmp/ov_estimate.txt"
filepath_std: "/tmp/ov_estimate_std.txt"
filepath_gt: "/tmp/ov_groundtruth.txt"

# ==================================================================
# ==================================================================

# our front-end feature tracking parameters
# we have a KLT and descriptor based (KLT is better implemented...)
use_klt: true # if true we will use KLT, otherwise use a ORB descriptor + robust matching
num_pts: 200 # number of points (per camera) we will extract and try to track
fast_threshold: 20 # threshold for fast extraction (warning: lower threshs can be expensive)
grid_x: 5 # extraction sub-grid count for horizontal direction (uniform tracking)
grid_y: 5 # extraction sub-grid count for vertical direction (uniform tracking)
min_px_dist: 10 # distance between features (features near each other provide less information)
knn_ratio: 0.70 # descriptor knn threshold for the top two descriptor matches
track_frequency: 21.0 # frequency we will perform feature tracking at (in frames per second / hertz)
downsample_cameras: false # will downsample image in half if true
num_opencv_threads: 4 # -1: auto, 0-1: serial, >1: number of threads
histogram_method: "HISTOGRAM" # NONE, HISTOGRAM, CLAHE

# aruco tag tracker for the system
# DICT_6X6_1000 from https://chev.me/arucogen/
use_aruco: false
num_aruco: 1024
downsize_aruco: true

# ==================================================================
# ==================================================================

# camera noises and chi-squared threshold multipliers
up_msckf_sigma_px: 1
up_msckf_chi2_multipler: 1
up_slam_sigma_px: 1
up_slam_chi2_multipler: 1
up_aruco_sigma_px: 1
up_aruco_chi2_multipler: 1

# masks for our images
use_mask: false

# imu and camera spacial-temporal
# imu config should also have the correct noise values
relative_config_imu: "kalibr_imu_chain.yaml"
relative_config_imucam: "kalibr_imucam_chain.yaml"

when i tried for the first time it drifted like in the photo so whenever i try with new calibrations nothing change.

[goldbattle]

Wow, those IMU noises are far to big and hits that your IMU driver isn't correct. What are you using for that?

Looking at the kalibr timing it seems your IMU has bad timestamps, which would also affect your IMU noise values.

It looks like Kalibr didn't even solve correctly, so I would start by investigating your IMU and getting a good kalibr calibration first.

[omeredemen]

Wow, those IMU noises are far to big and hits that your IMU driver isn't correct. What are you using for that?

I am using a drive that i wrote and it just reads register via I2C protocol and publish with ROS2

well I couldnt manage to fix timestamp issue. i was trying to fix with software but i got the result i sent. so now i just read the register and publish with ros in my driver.

here is my another calibration reports (driver just read imu)
rpi-mpu-report-cam.pdf
rpi-mpu-report-imucam.pdf

still has noises and bad timestamp and i dont know how to solve the issue. should i change my imu or driver?

[omeredemen]

Looking at the kalibr timing it seems your IMU has bad timestamps, which would also affect your IMU noise values.

I tried to reduce my imu noises with getting avarege of 500hz data and publish them as 100hz and fix bad timestamp with software (but still couldnt get a straight line)

It looks like Kalibr didn't even solve correctly, so I would start by investigating your IMU and getting a good kalibr calibration first.

I didnt understand this part How should i investigate my IMU?