Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Port to the Meson buildsystem #203

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

hughsie
Copy link
Contributor

@hughsie hughsie commented Jan 23, 2024

No description provided.

@hughsie
Copy link
Contributor Author

hughsie commented Mar 15, 2024

@vathpela you can be very honest here -- if you want me to break this up a bit that's fine too.

@vathpela
Copy link
Contributor

So I definitely want at least the coverity stuff split out as another patch (though it'd be nice to keep it working...) and the examples don't seem to work for me... Tbh not very happy with how e.g. the fanalyzer workflow goes.

Also can we fix it so ninja dist builds the .spec file into the tar all correctly?

(CI roots are rebuilding with meson+ninja in them now but it takes a while and it's Zelda time now.)

Signed-off-by: Richard Hughes <richard@hughsie.com>
@hughsie
Copy link
Contributor Author

hughsie commented Mar 19, 2024

the coverity stuff split out as another patch

Quick sanity check, the old coverity failure happened client side rather than on the covscan servers, right?

Coverity Build Capture (64-bit) version 2022.12.2 on Linux 6.7.9-200.fc39.x86_64 x86_64
Internal version numbers: 126f4dac91 p-2022.12-push-76
[9/9] Linking target src/eficonman
Emitted 5 C/C++ compilation units (100%) successfully
5 C/C++ compilation units (100%) are ready for analysis
The cov-build utility completed successfully.

and the examples don't seem to work for me

I've added some more guidance to README.md and removed the extra builds -- did that help?

Also can we fix it so ninja dist builds the .spec file into the tar all correctly

I don't think we can -- it's generated at build time as it's using the overridable @VERSION@ -- but if you ninja it -- it pops up in build -- so we can do

rpmbuild -ba efibootmgr.spec
...
Wrote: /home/hughsie/rpmbuild/SRPMS/efibootmgr-18-1.fc39.src.rpm
Wrote: /home/hughsie/rpmbuild/RPMS/efibootmgr-debugsource-18-1.fc39.x86_64.rpm
Wrote: /home/hughsie/rpmbuild/RPMS/efibootmgr-18-1.fc39.x86_64.rpm
Wrote: /home/hughsie/rpmbuild/RPMS/efibootmgr-debuginfo-18-1.fc39.x86_64.rpm
...
+ exit 0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants