Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

JWT Auth module #16

Open
wants to merge 18 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from
Open

JWT Auth module #16

wants to merge 18 commits into from

Conversation

jeevatkm
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@jeevatkm
Copy link
Contributor Author

Any updates on merge activity?

@brendensoares
Copy link
Member

How can we test this?

@notzippy
Copy link
Contributor

Do you think the examples should be left in this module or placed inside the revel/examples package ?

@pedromorgan
Copy link
Member

@jeevatkm I want the modules docs in the README.md definately.. Its then 'tied' to the code, and not ma problem ;-))

@notzippy notzippy changed the base branch from master to develop July 23, 2017 18:16
@notzippy notzippy added this to the v0.18 milestone Jul 23, 2017
@notzippy
Copy link
Contributor

I know it has been a really long time but would it be possible to refactor this package into revel/modules/auth/jwt ?

@notzippy notzippy modified the milestones: v0.19, v0.18 Aug 30, 2017
notzippy pushed a commit to notzippy/revel-modules that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2017
Added raw tags to the chat html pages so the template will function
@notzippy notzippy modified the milestones: v0.19, Backlog Jan 31, 2018
@ChadTaljaardt
Copy link

Is there any update for this?

@notzippy
Copy link
Contributor

notzippy commented Mar 20, 2018

@ChadTaljaardt I am going to create a new PR with this refactored

@notzippy notzippy modified the milestones: Backlog, v0.20 Mar 20, 2018
@ChadTaljaardt
Copy link

Thanks @notzippy

@pedromorgan
Copy link
Member

Ok so As I understan it,,
This is an auth mechanism

Is revel gonna get sued for this, or is it just a protocl ??

Like geriatric ./.htacess a new way ?

then htaceess locally would be cool also...

@notzippy notzippy modified the milestones: v0.20, Backlog Sep 23, 2018
@goevexx
Copy link

goevexx commented May 24, 2019

So there is no jwt implementation?

@brendensoares
Copy link
Member

We're planning on refactoring this as needed to get into the next release.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants