Skip to content

Issues: quicwg/multipath

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

55 Open 153 Closed
55 Open 153 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Label
Filter by label
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

Should the seq number space of MP_NEW_CONNECTION_ID be per-path or global?
#371 opened May 31, 2024 by mirjak
Details of MP_NEW_CONNECTION_ID frames are still missing editorial explicit path ID
#368 opened May 29, 2024 by huitema
Should we require explicit Abandon after path time-out? design
#366 opened May 28, 2024 by huitema
2
Where does RFC9000 talk about "refusing a path"? question Further information is requested
#362 opened May 28, 2024 by mirjak
Controlling Path and Path-ID resource editorial explicit path ID
#360 opened May 27, 2024 by huitema
Naming consistency of frames editorial
#359 opened May 27, 2024 by mirjak
How is "MP_" said? editorial
#349 opened May 25, 2024 by MikeBishop
1
Are MP_PATH_(AVAILABLE|STANDBY) probing frames? editorial
#347 opened May 25, 2024 by MikeBishop
3
What if SPA migration fails? design
#343 opened May 25, 2024 by MikeBishop
MAX_PATHS_BLOCKED design explicit path ID
#342 opened May 25, 2024 by MikeBishop
What should an endpoint do if it receives a PATH_CHALLENGE for an path ID that it doesn't have CIDs for? design explicit path ID
#340 opened May 24, 2024 by mirjak
1
Review text in CID retirement section editorial
#339 opened May 23, 2024 by mirjak
Clarify how new CIDs are allocated design explicit path ID
#338 opened May 23, 2024 by mirjak
5
How should the receiver react if it receives Connection IDs for non-authorised paths IDs? design explicit path ID
#336 opened May 17, 2024 by mirjak
1
Add a short name for "Multipath Extension for QUIC" (possibly "Multipath QUIC") and an abbreviation (possibly "MP-QUIC") editorial
#335 opened May 14, 2024 by SpencerDawkins
3
Should active_connection_id_limit be per path or per connection? design explicit path ID needs-discussion
#332 opened May 14, 2024 by mirjak
2
Designing odd/even path-id, or not. design explicit path ID needs-discussion
#328 opened Apr 3, 2024 by huitema
1
8
How will MPQUIC support the scenario where the client connects with a dual-stack server via both IPv4 and IPv6 paths? separate draft
#327 opened Apr 3, 2024 by yangfurong
6
The spec doesn't say enough about DPLPMTUD or max_udp_payload_size question Further information is requested
#326 opened Apr 2, 2024 by LPardue
1
Alternative to defining a bunch of MP-specific frames no-action-needed
#323 opened Mar 20, 2024 by martinthomson
3
Static path IDs? design explicit path ID needs-discussion
#321 opened Mar 19, 2024 by kazuho
2
Sending NEW_CONNECTION_ID and RETIRE_CONNECTION_ID frames when multipath has been negotiated editorial explicit path ID
#320 opened Mar 18, 2024 by michael-eriksson
5
What if a client falsely links two paths using CIDs associated with the same path ID explicit path ID
#319 opened Mar 17, 2024 by yfmascgy
7
Should path numbers be continuous? editorial explicit path ID needs PR
#318 opened Mar 17, 2024 by huitema
7
explicit path IDs: Should server preferred address have its own path ID? explicit path ID needs PR
#317 opened Mar 17, 2024 by marten-seemann
3
ProTip! Type g i on any issue or pull request to go back to the issue listing page.