Temporarily pack json-with-bigint locally until this package supports CJS modules #9
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
json-with-bigintdoes not support CJS, and this led to issues for users of the our JS SDK loading CJS in Node:https://discord.com/channels/907569970500743200/1209507491746942976/1209507491746942976
We'll add support for ESM ourselves. In the meantime, this packs the dependency locally, since rolling back also introduces regressions in the GH workflows and vulnerability issues that got resolved when we merged the PR previously.