Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Require nnz==0 in sparse meta tensors #125221

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

pearu
Copy link
Collaborator

@pearu pearu commented Apr 30, 2024

As in the title and per discussion starting at #117907 (comment)

Stack from ghstack (oldest at bottom):

Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Apr 30, 2024

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/125221

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit c23f10a with merge base c1a3fcf (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the release notes: sparse release notes category label Apr 30, 2024
pearu added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2024
ghstack-source-id: 589493ea836e07d9fab1be050581bda753844924
Pull Request resolved: #125221
@pearu pearu added topic: not user facing topic category topic: bc breaking topic category topic: new features topic category labels Apr 30, 2024
@pearu pearu added ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request ciflow/inductor labels Apr 30, 2024
As in the title and per discussion starting at #117907 (comment)




[ghstack-poisoned]
pearu added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2024
ghstack-source-id: e7b6de2900ac5e3a7fc096b9ecac2ff114334b3e
Pull Request resolved: #125221
As in the title and per discussion starting at #117907 (comment)




[ghstack-poisoned]
pearu added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 30, 2024
ghstack-source-id: 90759b1c4209e4e7c259b0509a82b80237076d7b
Pull Request resolved: #125221
@pearu pearu requested review from ezyang and amjames May 1, 2024 09:09
@ezyang
Copy link
Contributor

ezyang commented May 1, 2024

@pytorchbot merge

@pytorchmergebot
Copy link
Collaborator

Merge started

Your change will be merged once all checks pass (ETA 0-4 Hours).

Learn more about merging in the wiki.

Questions? Feedback? Please reach out to the PyTorch DevX Team

Advanced Debugging
Check the merge workflow status
here

petrex pushed a commit to petrex/pytorch that referenced this pull request May 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ciflow/inductor ciflow/trunk Trigger trunk jobs on your pull request Merged open source release notes: sparse release notes category topic: bc breaking topic category topic: new features topic category topic: not user facing topic category
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants