gh-118345: Fix os.path.abspath() & posixpath.abspath() for relative paths on the other platform
#118346
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Co-authored-by: Eryk Sun <eryksun@gmail.com>
nineteendo
changed the title
os.path.abspath()os.path.abspath() for relative paths on the other platform
|
The failing tests are to be expected: you shouldn't run functions of |
nineteendo
commented
Apr 27, 2024
nineteendo
commented
Apr 27, 2024
nineteendo
changed the title
os.path.abspath() for relative paths on the other platformos.path.abspath() & posixpath.abspath() for relative paths on the other platform
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Ideally merged after #117855, then we don't need to check
os.nameforposixpath.abspath().It looks like we need to use if for
posixpath.realpath()though.os.path.abspath()&posixpath.realpath()don't work for relative paths on the other platform #118345