fix: don't start dbus service during build in Dockerfile #12374
Merged
+0
−1
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
OrKoN
changed the title
|
🤖 I detect that the PR title and the commit message differ and there's only one commit. To use the PR title for the commit history, you can use Github's automerge feature with squashing, or use -- conventional-commit-lint bot |
|
That's a bug, thanks! |
OrKoN
approved these changes
May 2, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Removing from image build phase a command that only makes sense at runtime.
No tests, no doc updates
Other changes will be required to maintain the intent of the dbus service command, but that will be informed by the direction of the project.
This will prevent a developer thinking that dbus should be running, when the actual command runs the service for a short time only during build not during runtime.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Probably not
Other information
Please feel free to reject this, and incorporate an alternative PR. I'm just highlighting the issue.