Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

PouchDB 6.2.0 - db.type() is deprecated #63

Closed
tcoats opened this issue May 9, 2017 · 6 comments · May be fixed by #64
Closed

PouchDB 6.2.0 - db.type() is deprecated #63

tcoats opened this issue May 9, 2017 · 6 comments · May be fixed by #64
Labels
help wanted

Comments

@tcoats
Copy link

tcoats commented May 9, 2017

I believe this repo needs upgrading to avoid this deprecated warning.

db.type() is deprecated and will be removed in a future version of PouchDB
@filionf filionf mentioned this issue Jun 15, 2017
Open
@bioleyl bioleyl mentioned this issue Jul 18, 2017
Closed
@bioleyl
Copy link

bioleyl commented Jul 18, 2017

Same problem for me. Would be perfect to avoid this warning because it fires thousand times in the console when we dump.

@pubkey
Copy link

pubkey commented Nov 4, 2017

Is anyone working on a PR for this?

@cepm-nate
Copy link

cepm-nate commented Jan 24, 2018 •
edited

According to pouchdb/pouchdb#6106, all this repo needs is this._remote = true added somewhere.... @nolanlawson, I can give it a shot, but don't know the internals like you do. Anyone want to give it a shot?

@thebigh2014 thebigh2014 mentioned this issue Feb 27, 2018
Open
@AdrianoFerrari AdrianoFerrari mentioned this issue Mar 15, 2018
Closed
@AdrianoFerrari
Copy link
Member

Seemed like a straight-forward fix (using other pouchdb libraries as reference for how they handled this).
Can the PR #74 be merged, @nolanlawson ?

AdrianoFerrari added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 16, 2018
@AdrianoFerrari
Merge pull request #74 from gingko/db-type-warning
56f0511 
"Remote false" flag added, to avoid "db.type() is deprecated" warning (Fixes #63).
@abhishiv
Copy link

abhishiv commented May 4, 2019

Hey guys, I'm using 1.2.9 but still seeing this log. Am I missing something?

@lgarron
Copy link

lgarron commented Oct 29, 2022

This... still seems to be an issue. 😕

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
help wanted
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

(#63) Add support for remote flag & PouchDB 6.2. filionf/pouchdb-replication-stream
8 participants
@abhishiv @lgarron @AdrianoFerrari @tcoats @calvinmetcalf @pubkey @cepm-nate @bioleyl