Pass metadata to gotenberg-chromium processor

[muratbinerbay]

This will let us pass metadata to the PDF file like title, author, copyright, and creation date.

Documentation links:

• https://gotenberg.dev/docs/routes#metadata-chromium
• https://github.com/gotenberg/gotenberg-php/blob/a8759e59ec7d02248ac816f2f9ada7507371779e/src/Modules/ChromiumPdf.php#L173

[github-actions]

CLA Assistant Lite bot All contributors have signed the CLA ✍️ ✅

[muratbinerbay]

I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA

[muratbinerbay]

recheck

[muratbinerbay]

@kingjia90 on v2.2.0 the formValue has protected access. I reverted last 2 commits to what @blankse suggested.

https://github.com/gotenberg/gotenberg-php/blob/main/src/MultipartFormDataModule.php#L92

[blankse]

@muratbinerbay @kingjia90 The formValue is only in 1.1.8 public.
See:
gotenberg/gotenberg-php@33298eb
gotenberg/gotenberg-php@993384d
So we need to bump the version in composer, right?
"gotenberg/gotenberg-php": "^1.1.8 || ^2.2",

[kingjia90]

So many plot twists 😄 Thank you for the changes.
It seems that PHPStan is triggering some false positive i guess, do we need to mute these?

[blankse]

@kingjia90 Yes PhpStan doesn't want the formValue method because it is protected in 2.2. But it isn't reachable there.

[muratbinerbay]

@blankse @kingjia90 do we want to try something like ReflectionMethod. Seems rather excessive to me but I'm willing to try it :)

[blankse]

Doesn't work :(

I think we need the same construct like in pimcore/pimcore. We have there a own phpstan config for lowest with reportUnmatchedIgnoredErrors: false:
https://github.com/pimcore/pimcore/blob/11.x/phpstan-lowest.neon

So we can create a phpstan baseline with the highest dependencies.

[blankse]

Of course, we could also process the metadata with version 2.2 only, if that is an alternative :)

[muratbinerbay]

Of course, we could also process the metadata with version 2.2 only, if that is an alternative :)

would also be acceptable in my opinion, @kingjia90 what do you think?

[kingjia90]

That would be also fine to me, no any objection, but it seems that then it would need a doc or changelog entry (as example) to better explain that "difference" (that metadata is available only if you use gotenberg-php 2.2+ )

maybe let's have a final confirmation by @fashxp first on how to proceed

[muratbinerbay]

Hi @kingjia90 @fashxp, just wanted to ping you to check if I can go ahead and make the metadata available only for gotenberg-php:2.2+ ?
Thanks!