Generate graphic reports for phys2bids outputs

[me-pic]

Closes #131, #407

The PR solved the issues in #407 with the proposed changes mentioned below.
The PR #407 was itself a follow-up of #243

Proposed Changes

• Restrict bokeh version
• Match bokehJS version to bokeh version
• Remove x axes constraints

Change Type

• bugfix (+0.0.1)
• minor (+0.1.0)
• major (+1.0.0)
• refactoring (no version update)
• test (no version update)
• infrastructure (no version update)
• documentation (no version update)
• other

Checklist before review

• I added everything I wanted to add to this PR.
• [Code or tests only] I wrote/updated the necessary docstrings.
• [Code or tests only] I ran and passed tests locally.
• [Documentation only] I built the docs locally.
• My contribution is harmonious with the rest of the code: I'm not introducing repetitions.
• My code respects the adopted style, especially linting conventions.
• The title of this PR is explanatory on its own, enough to be understood as part of a changelog.
• I added or indicated the right labels.

• I added information regarding the timeline of completion for this PR.

• Please, comment on my PR while it's a draft and give me feedback on the development!

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 98.78049% with 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 91.75%. Comparing base (d796fe1) to head (10ab4ef).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #464      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   91.18%   91.75%   +0.57%     
==========================================
  Files           8        9       +1     
  Lines        1010     1092      +82     
==========================================
+ Hits          921     1002      +81     
- Misses         89       90       +1     

Files	Coverage Δ
phys2bids/cli/run.py	96.66% <100.00%> (+0.11%)	⬆️
phys2bids/phys2bids.py	87.43% <100.00%> (+0.20%)	⬆️
phys2bids/reporting/html_report.py	98.71% <98.71%> (ø)

[smoia]

@me-pic this is awesome!!! Can you look into the readthedocs failure, please?

[me-pic]

@smoia Not sure exactly what is happening with the doc... Been able to build it locally without any error using sphinx-build. Any hint on what I could check ?

[smoia]

No idea - I think it's happening also in #462. It seems to be something about the phys2bids.phys2bids module import?

[smoia]

@me-pic probably the best option is to update the documentation configuration (as well as sphinx packages version). Maybe we can open a new PR, trying to fit phys2bids docs into nigsp's configuration (it's more recent): https://github.com/MIPLabCH/nigsp/tree/master/docs

[me-pic]

@smoia Thank you ! Will take a look next week.