Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enable implicit solvers for complex inputs #411

Merged
merged 3 commits into from May 13, 2024

Conversation

Randl
Copy link
Contributor

@Randl Randl commented May 4, 2024

Related to #388

@Randl
Copy link
Contributor Author

Randl commented May 4, 2024

Ok we need a new release of optimistix (specifically patrick-kidger/optimistix#53) for that one

@patrick-kidger
Copy link
Owner

Ah, I'd been wanting to do a new Optimistix release anyway, so that sounds good to me.

Just to double check before I do: so far as you know, is Optimistix completely ready on the complex-support front? If so then I'll advertise this in the release notes for it.

@Randl
Copy link
Contributor Author

Randl commented May 4, 2024

I've added some complex-related tests in the PR and it passed and I didn't encounter any issues when I played with it. I didn't take a look at minimization (complex->real functions) though. Maybe advertise it as "experimental support", and I'll be happy to help with bug fixing if there will be any.

@Randl
Copy link
Contributor Author

Randl commented May 12, 2024

@patrick-kidger good to go?

@patrick-kidger patrick-kidger merged commit 4cb2475 into patrick-kidger:dev May 13, 2024
2 checks passed
@patrick-kidger
Copy link
Owner

Yup, LGTM!

patrick-kidger pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 19, 2024
* Enable implicit solvers for complex inputs

* change version

* make pyright happy
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants