README overhaul top section

[TomWFox]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #318 into master will decrease coverage by 2.79%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           master     #318     +/-   ##
=========================================
- Coverage   58.77%   55.98%   -2.8%     
=========================================
  Files          91       91             
  Lines        6128     6127      -1     
  Branches        0     1011   +1011     
=========================================
- Hits         3602     3430    -172     
+ Misses       2526     2519      -7     
- Partials        0      178    +178

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
Parse/Internal/Push/State/MutablePushState.cs	42.5% <0%> (-45%)	⬇️
Parse/Internal/Push/Coder/ParsePushEncoder.cs	61.11% <0%> (-13.89%)	⬇️
Parse/Public/ParseClient.cs	63.41% <0%> (-10.66%)	⬇️
Parse/Internal/Command/ParseCommand.cs	85.1% <0%> (-10.64%)	⬇️
Parse/Internal/Operation/ParseRemoveOperation.cs	36.84% <0%> (-10.53%)	⬇️
Parse/Public/ParseQuery.cs	14.35% <0%> (-8.72%)	⬇️
Parse/Public/ParseACL.cs	77.38% <0%> (-8.34%)	⬇️
Parse/Internal/Operation/ParseFieldOperations.cs	75% <0%> (-8.34%)	⬇️
Parse/Internal/File/State/FileState.cs	92.85% <0%> (-7.15%)	⬇️
Parse/Internal/Encoding/PointerOrLocalIdEncoder.cs	78.57% <0%> (-7.15%)	⬇️
... and 26 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 077b48e...986e636. Read the comment docs.

[TobiasPott]

Hi @TomWFox
I'm currently doing some maintenance on this repo and couldn't assess your PR.
This is just for clarifications on the Readme and you are still working on it (as it is still in draft state)?
Kind regards
Tobias

[TomWFox]

Hi @TobiasPott 👋

Good to hear! This PR is still not finished, it is mainly getting it ready for our new open collective sponsorship tiers, I'll get to it soon.

[TobiasPott]

Hi @TomWFox
thank you for the update on this. =)

[saamerm]

@TomWFox do we still need this?