Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Single Cell genotypes #7

Open
qian0001 opened this issue Oct 25, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Single Cell genotypes #7

qian0001 opened this issue Oct 25, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@qian0001
Copy link

Hi,
I am using your SCAN-SNV to find the somatic variants from our WGS. We are concerned about the somatic genotype call results for the single cells. I am attaching 4 example record that passes somatic$pass (i.e., somatic$pass == TRUE) in table somatic from one of somatic_genotypes.rda files. I have transposed row/columns for better displays.

The 4 examples show the SingleCell genotypes (row 11) as 1/1, and coverage depths (ref.1,alt.1) as (0,10), (1,14), (0,27) and (0,15).
I understand that these results are coming from SCAN-SNV’s first step, GATK, for selecting candidates variants in your pipeline. The genotype calls and coverages may not be used in later steps. Should I assume these four cases are all true somatic mutations with heterozygous genotypes even though the raw data points to homozygous alternative alleles?

I also like to ask why final genotype call results would contradict the initial GATK genotype calls. Those coverages strongly suggest that the somatic variants are homozygous, as almost all the reads have the “alt.1” alleles. Put it in another way, is it true that the AB model will be so strong/confident to call it a heterozygote when there are 0 ref alleles and 27 alternative alleles?

This is important as we are looking at somatic signatures and need the accurate genotypes for the single cells. Please advise.

Thanks you very much.

Yong

sSNVs-1-1-examples.xlsx

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant