Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

move refs to their respective categories #271

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

move refs to their respective categories #271

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

andy5995
Copy link
Contributor

Suggestion for #241

I could start on this and see how far I get. I don't think it has to be done all at once.

In the meantime, the docs could get updated to let people know to use this style for any future pull requests.

@@ -100,16 +100,19 @@ Tools that automate the building and testing of projects in C.
new projects. [``BSD-2-Clause``][BSD-2-Clause]
* [CMake][329] - Cross-platform family of tools designed to build, package and test
software. [``BSD-3-Clause``][BSD-3-Clause]
* [GNU Make][324] - Tool which controls the generation of executables and other
* [GNU Make][gnu-make-ref] - Tool which controls the generation of executables and other
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
* [GNU Make][gnu-make-ref] - Tool which controls the generation of executables and other
* [GNU Make][util-001] - Tool which controls the generation of executables and other

This would be better, imo

* [Premake][435] - Command-line utility which reads a scripted definition of a
software project and uses it to generate project files for Visual Studio and
GNU Make. Other targets are also being worked on. [``BSD-3-Clause``][BSD-3-Clause]
* [SCons][521] - Software construction tool using Python. [``MIT``][MIT]
* [xmake][271] - Cross-platform build utility. [``Apache-2.0``][Apache-2.0]
* [zproject][420] - Project generator and build system support tool. [``MPL-2.0``][MPL-2.0]

[gnu-make-ref]: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
[gnu-make-ref]: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/
[util-001]: https://www.gnu.org/software/make/

@andy5995
Copy link
Contributor Author

@oz123 A better way to do it I think would be to not use the separate refs, and just use the format [text](link). I don't see much benefit for this type of document to separate the links.

@andy5995 andy5995 closed this by deleting the head repository Mar 20, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant