Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cold archive overview update #5582

Draft
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

fpillotovh
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@lason-ovh lason-ovh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the lifecycle.png is misleading: in the archiving flow, it says minimum_days=30 which is wrong, for the context, when I made the schema, it was to explain to @agoude the upcoming feature of being able to set a minimum retention days to remove any possibility to delete the archive within the aforementioned retention period.
Anyway, it we want to emphasize that there is a minimum engagement period for archives, we should at least update the value to 180 days

1. Store your data in an Object Storage bucket first in RBX Region – this bucket is a temporary bucket,
2. Archive it on tapes,
3. Retrieve your data
4. Decide to move or suppress the data from the temporary bucket
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

for 4. and 5. could we try to mention there are post-archiving process (move/delete actions).

Copy link
Contributor

@lason-ovh lason-ovh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the lifecycle schema has an error: in the archiving process, in step 2, it should be 180 instead of 30

@fpillotovh fpillotovh marked this pull request as draft December 21, 2023 16:39
Copy link
Contributor

@lason-ovh lason-ovh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Text is good for me, except the lifecycle image that must be changed (see my last comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants